So, if my system, which is not really the most adequate for FS9 ( it's a MacPro 8 core 2.66, but since FS9 doesn't really use more than one, it's similar to a 2.66 Core Duo, and the graphic card is an ATI 4870 with 512 MB, so it's almost obsolete by now ), runs DOUBLE the fps you are reporting, it's clear the problem is NOT the scenery, but something else you installed. This, compared to your reported 20ish figure with all the scenery in. As you can see, with the framerate locked at 30 fps, the scenery can keep with it easily, and it goes at 40 unlocked, without removing anything. ![]() Because it obviously isn't, and if you made a bit of research around the various flight sim forums on the good reputation for fps ALL our sceneries have (with the exclusion of KLAX for FS9, that wasn't really made for FS9 in mind, and is not as fast as our other sceneries), and especially KORD, you would have had poof of this.īut of course, you don't have to take my word for it, just have a look at the attached screenshots on my system.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |